Named accounts and recovery
Review who can sign in, which privileges they need and who controls recovery. Discuss multi-factor authentication where supported, including a workable process when an authorised person is unavailable.
Keep quotation enquiries, product information and technical downloads dependable, with website security shaped around how your manufacturing business sells.
Quotation requests, product catalogues and technical downloads, with a clear boundary around production systems.


Sales continuityKeep the route from product research to an enquiry understandable.
Clear boundariesPublic website work starts with a named owner and authorized scope.
Practical handoverKnow what changed, what remains and who takes the next step.
Understand the security and payment signals your customers see, together with the controls behind your website.
The journeys your website supports
Start with the routes people actually use: researching a product, requesting a quote, downloading information and returning through an external tool. These examples help define a review; the presence of a feature does not mean every connected system is included.

A buyer may describe quantities, materials or a production requirement through your website. Map which fields you need, where the request goes and what acknowledgement the buyer receives. The review can examine the website-side form configuration and recipients without asking you to share real customer submissions.
If your RFQ process accepts drawings or other files, agree that feature explicitly. File-type and size controls, storage location and retrieval permissions need separate attention. An unrestricted public upload route is not an appropriate default for sensitive commercial documents.
A manufacturing website often answers technical questions before a buyer ever speaks to sales. If its enquiry routes or published information change unexpectedly, the consequence is more than an untidy page: your team may have to reconcile missing requests, incorrect specifications and uncertain buyer communications.
An altered recipient, broken form or failed integration can leave a buyer waiting. Establish where each request should arrive and who checks that the route still works after website changes.
Unauthorised edits to materials, dimensions, applications or contact details can create confusion for procurement teams. Public content needs clear publishing responsibility and a dependable approved source.
A brochure intended for anyone and a drawing intended for an approved buyer have different handling needs. A media URL is not a substitute for an agreed access-control design.
Marketing may publish, engineering may approve specifications and an agency may maintain the CMS. Gaps between those roles make updates, account removal and incident decisions harder.


Manufacturing teams need a workable publishing routine that includes marketing, sales, engineering and whoever maintains the website. The useful outcome is a set of responsibilities people can follow after the review.
Review who can sign in, which privileges they need and who controls recovery. Discuss multi-factor authentication where supported, including a workable process when an authorised person is unavailable.
Agree who maintains the CMS, theme and plugins. Pair planned maintenance with checks of important product pages, downloads and enquiry routes, plus a defined rollback decision.
Discuss backups of the site and required content, who can restore them and how an authorised recovery exercise would be approved. A backup’s existence alone does not demonstrate a working restore.
Name the people who decide whether to pause an affected form, preserve relevant evidence or contact the host and agency. Confirm out-of-hours arrangements separately.
The starting point is the public business website and its authorised supporting components. The review can be adapted to different sales models without treating every manufacturer as an online shop.

A scope that fits your operations
A public manufacturing website can link to many systems that run a business. This page describes website security services; it does not authorize access to industrial environments or imply specialist assessment of them.
The named public site, approved hosting configuration and CMS access supplied for the review.
Needs a separate agreementOther domains, a separate portal, custom application or hosting account not listed in the agreed scope.
Website-side enquiry routes and the agreed handling of attachments or downloads.
Needs a separate agreementCustomer file contents, confidential design review, document-management platforms and engineering approval.
The website-side configuration of specifically listed tools and the handoff to their provider.
Needs a separate agreementERP, CRM back-end testing, supplier systems, distributor infrastructure and the provider’s internal services.
Recording the boundary so website work does not cross into production operations.
Needs a separate agreementOperational technology, industrial control systems, PLCs, SCADA, machinery, production networks and safety systems.
The work begins with the business website’s actual role. Access and technical checks follow an agreed scope, with findings tied to the journeys and owners affected.
Share public URLs and describe the most important enquiry and product journeys. Identify the CMS, host, maintenance partner and external tools without sending passwords.
Confirm authorized domains, environments, methods, access, testing windows and excluded systems. Decide whether functional form tests or attachment checks are appropriate before they happen.
Examine the approved website configuration and supporting evidence. Separate confirmed observations from limitations, unavailable access and issues that need the provider’s investigation.
Prioritise findings with the responsible people. Record what can be changed, who approves it and how the affected website journey will be checked after the work.
The agreed deliverables connect technical observations to the work of sales, marketing and the team maintaining the website. The proposal confirms their format and depth.

Begin with a defined review or discuss continued care. Service availability, technical work, deliverables and response arrangements are confirmed for your environment before an engagement starts.
Useful when you need a clear view of the public site’s exposures, publishing roles or a specific sales journey before deciding on further work.
Discuss an ongoing arrangement when maintenance ownership, security checks and follow-up need a regular place in the website’s operating routine.
If the website is already showing unexpected redirects, altered contact details or suspicious content, describe the symptoms and when they started. Avoid repeated unplanned changes while the next step is being agreed.
Discuss a potentially compromised website
The expertise behind Defendoria
Founder · PhD in Cyber Security
Research-informed thinking, practical explanations and a review that respects how your business operates. Start with a conversation about your website, the people involved and the decisions you need to make.
Meet DefendoriaA short inventory helps define a useful proposal. Start with public information and business context; credentials and sensitive files belong in an agreed secure process later, if they are needed.
These answers explain the starting scope and the details to discuss before work begins.
No. This service page concerns the public website and specifically agreed website components. Factory networks, operational technology, PLCs, SCADA, machinery and safety systems are excluded. They require separately authorised specialist work.
We can discuss a scoped review of the website-side upload and retrieval approach. Confirm file types, storage, access and ownership first. Do not send customer drawings through the initial enquiry; functional tests use an agreed method and sample content.
Your business decides which documents should be public or restricted. We can review the website’s agreed delivery and access approach against that intention. Engineering accuracy, intellectual property decisions and legal requirements remain with the appropriate owners.
Include the agency in the scope and responsibility discussion. Agree who authorizes access, approves changes and verifies the affected journeys. The Agency Partnerships service may be relevant to the provider’s wider client-site support.
Not automatically. We can identify where the public website hands over to another system. Separate applications and provider infrastructure need their own authorization, methods and agreed technical scope.
WordPress Security may fit a WordPress-based site. WooCommerce Security may be relevant if the manufacturer sells parts or equipment through WooCommerce. The platform and actual journeys determine the proposed work.
No review or control can guarantee that. The purpose is to understand the agreed website’s exposures, plan practical improvements and make remaining limitations clear. Continued maintenance and responsibility are part of ongoing risk reduction.
Start with your website
Tell us which public manufacturing website you are responsible for and what needs attention: quotation enquiries, product publishing, downloads, access or an unexpected change.